Blame being leveled at the media
Saturday, May 26th, 2007There’s a bizarre bit of finger-pointing going on towards the Irish media for its failure to “reflect” the public opinion on Fianna Fail which is now obvious in light of their electoral success.
The thing that’s off-putting about this idea is the automatic acceptance built into it that the media does and should pander to what’s popular rather than present the facts.
There is no doubt that the numerous polls over the past few months got it badly wrong. This is partly because of the last minute swing that began to show itself in the final week of campaign and it is - as Braz points out in a comment here - partly because of the irrelevance of a FPTP poll question on a PR-STV election.
However some people, including Eoghan Harris who showed more than enough of his true colours on The Last Word this morning (.wma link), seem to believe that if the public are in support of a certain person or party the media should reflect that and keep its mouth shut.
The media (bar the letters page) is not a voice-box for public opinion. If a politician is exceedingly popular that should not stop the media from asking legitimate questions of them. Indeed, if the public at large doesn’t even care about the issue and isn’t itself bothered with the questions that doesn’t make it any less legitimate and should not be justification for shelving things of democratic importance.
It should never be the case that the media gauges public opinion, sees it swinging to the right or left and then begins to produce copy to appeal to that audience. It happens, of course, but it shouldn’t and pundits and politicians shouldn’t be demanding that it does.
Harris’ admittance that the Sunday Independent attacked Bertie Ahern until it “got what it wanted” shows up everything that is wrong with that newspaper and with certain sections of the media too. It was happy to go into attack mode until a price was paid but no-one should have been raising real questions about Ahern when it was obvious that people liked him. How dare they.
He basically admitted to using his paper’s influence to inform policy rather than people. It was used as a blunt weapon for its middle-class readership and staff. It was never about finding the facts, disseminating them and letting the reader decide. It was all about forcing an issue of, on a political scale, minor importance down the throats of Fianna Fail to achieve a pay-off.
Campaigning journalism isn’t an evil in the right hands - just read about Harold Evans’ work in The Sunday Times. But Harris wasn’t striving for the greater good, his campaign was nothing other than self-serving and at no point does his “campaign” constitute as journalistic or important.
There is a fair question for the public to ask of The Irish Times and others who wrote about revelations over Ahern’s finances. Was there an ulterior motive behind the articles? Was it an orchestrated attempt to damage Fianna Fail? I don’t think there’s any real evidence to suggest that there was such a motive or it was a planned-out attack, but the media should be held to account just as much as politicians.
But to suggest that the media shouldn’t have been asking questions of Ahern because the public didn’t want them to is just baffling.
Blogs elsewhere
May 26th, 2007 at 8:03 pm
Politics is so exhausting that I cannot think of anything to add to this conversation.
Your contribution is clear and very nicely printed.
Well done.
Regards,
Anouilh
May 27th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
I don’t think there’s any real evidence to suggest that there was such a motive or it was a planned-out attack,
Timing. What is the probabilty that they found out about it just at election time?
It motive might be sales but I definitly think it was planned.
May 27th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
Well the article in the IT, which came on the Monday after the Dáil was dissolved, came on the back of confidential information sent out by the Mahon Tribunal to people due to speak in front of it.
This was only sent out days before Module 2 was due to commence (which was the very same Monday) so it’s reasonable to believe that the IT printed it once they got it, rather than assume they’d been sitting on it for weeks/months.
May 27th, 2007 at 6:34 pm
fair enough
June 17th, 2007 at 4:45 pm
[…] Harris previously said about The Sunday Independent’s stance on Fianna Fáil during his now infamous freak-out on Today FM, he and his newspaper seem to fit this perfectly: …Far from being true as [Vincent] Browne […]
August 3rd, 2007 at 1:30 pm
[…] was showcased with great style during his post-election rant on The Last Word, where he tried to attack The Irish Times for reporting news. He said then that his newspaper […]
August 5th, 2007 at 9:04 pm
[…] that this might be the case, but the man’s diva-like performances on the Late Late and on The Last Word lead me to believe that his writings are best explained by mental instability. Harris is the […]